The impressive
advances made by informatics and telecommunications in the last years are
leading to serious tensions on medical ethics and professional practice.
With Internet and telemedicine, there is for the first time the real possibility
of diagnosing and treating patients remotely, using computer networks.
There are many studies proving that the cost/benefit ratio provided by
telemedicine can be very favourable in many situations (for example, when
a single specialized physician can deliver medical attention to several
geographycally remote places which are medically underserved, with no need
to travel.)
Problems begin to appear when we imagine
that the entire legal and ethical framework of traditional medicine (which,
in Brazil, like in many countries, is under the supervision of some country-level
appointed medical council or association) does not comtemplate, with very
few exceptions, the advances brought about by telemedicine. Legally, in
the USA as in Brazil, no physician is allowed to practice outside the state
boundaries where he/she has received official license. Telemedicine makes
this an easy thing to to, regardless of the distance; or even across country
borders. Furthermore, it is clear that due legal process in cases of malpractice,
violation of medical ethics, protection of patient confidentiality, etc.,
is very difficult to be carried out when physicians and patients, and different
legal systems of two countries are involved !
Danger is looming: for countries like Brazil,
there is a real possibility (already happening !), that European and American
physicians start to use these loopholes, omissions and difficulties of
medical regulations and laws to gain access to huge worldwide markets of
medical services, by means of telemedicine, avoiding any legal responsibilities
or accountability. Many institutions abroad, hard-pressed by the economic
crisis of the health care sector, are on the lookout for alternative markets.
Recently, one of the largest medical insurance companies in Brazil, owned
by a big bank, began to study the possibility of offering medical second
opinion services for their customers in the highest paid coverage plans.
They are considering using telemedicine technology to connect to prestigious
universities and hospitals in the USA for that purpose. In case the patient
has doubts about the diagnosis or treatment recommended by Brazilian physicians
accredited by this insurance company, they will have the right to hold
a telemedical consultation with American specialists, sending x-rays, ECGs,
full medical history, etc.; using Internet.
The medical establishment feels that it
is unacceptable that physicians from other countries are allowed to practice
in this country without licensure; but, at the same time, it is clear that
this is going to be a remarkably hard obstacle for the progress of international
telemedicine and the benefits which it may bring to patients and to the
local health care situation. Medical knowledge is borderless in nature,
and many patients who are able to pay would like to have free access to
it. Sometimes is easier to pay for a telemedical consultation than to pay
for airfare and stay of a patient to be sent to Cleveland or NewYork, a
bill which may easily run into the tens of thousands of dollars.
In addition, there is also a need of caution
when remote diagnosis and treatment is done without a face-to-face encounter
and examination of the patient.
As it often happens, economical issues
are going to steer the entire process, and all relevant issues must be
carefully taken in consideration by the involved professionals, medical
associations, lawmakers, etc., before it's too late.
Message
from the Editor
Virtual Medicine and Ethics
Published by:
Center for Biomedical
Informatics
State University of Campinas,
Brazil
© 1997 Renato
M.E. Sabbatini Sponsored by:
Searle Brasil